#138 Ling-2.6-flash
none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- -
- Tokens
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash
Samenvatting
Benchmarkvergelijking Ling-2.6-flash vs GLM 4.7 Flash: Ling-2.6-flash leidt in gemiddelde score met 5.0 vs 4.4. Ling-2.6-flash heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.001 vs $0.054. Ling-2.6-flash is sneller met 9.34s vs 35.10s, met slagingspercentages van 31.8% vs 33.3%.
Aanbevolen model: Ling-2.6-flash - Het heeft hier de beste score (5.0) en kost ongeveer 108.3x minder dan GLM 4.7 Flash.
Benchmarks gegenereerd uit AI BENCHY-testsuites op: 2026-06-04
| Metriek | Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none | GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.0 | 4.4 |
| Rang | #138 | #158 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 6.7 |
| Consistentie | 9.2 | 6.8 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 31.8% | 33.3% |
| Instabiele tests | 2 | 8 |
| Totaal runs | 63 | 63 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 0.005 | 1.337 |
| Totale kosten | $0.001 | $0.054 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.010 / 1M | $0.060 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.030 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 40,718 | 37,206 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 2,878 | 43,754 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 0 | 89,079 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 9.34s | 35.10s |
| Responstijd (max) | 35.34s | 174.55s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 177.48s | 456.24s |
Generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#158 GLM 4.7 Flash
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 186.2s
- Tokens
- 12,112 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 4.7 | 5.9 | 41.7% | 2 | 14.95s | 555 | 1,122 | 6,110 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.2 | 7.4 | 11.1% | 1 | 55.33s | 3,106 | 4,981 | 22,387 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.34s | 20,818 | 1,069 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.8 | 2.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 65.57s | 17,185 | 2,585 | 20,648 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.51s | 7,107 | 584 | 2,755 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.95s | 810 | 24 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 174.55s | 643 | 33,000 | 25,394 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.6 | 9.7 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.14s | 318 | 18 | 2,138 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 6.2 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 2.97s | 636 | 388 | 2,181 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 12.93s | 521 | 781 | 5,255 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.95s | 6,949 | 224 | 1,014 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| GLM 4.7 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.13s | 186 | 71 | 1,197 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Ling-2.6-1TnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3.5-9BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMiMo-V2-FlashnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMistral Small 4mediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumGranite 4.1 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGPT-4o-mininonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium