#138 Ling-2.6-flash
none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- -
- Tokens
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder Next
Samenvatting
Benchmarkvergelijking Ling-2.6-flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next: Ling-2.6-flash leidt in gemiddelde score met 5.0 vs 4.6. Ling-2.6-flash heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.001 vs $0.008. Qwen3 Coder Next is sneller met 8.58s vs 9.34s, met slagingspercentages van 31.8% vs 28.6%.
Aanbevolen model: Ling-2.6-flash - Het heeft hier de beste score (5.0) en kost ongeveer 15.9x minder dan Qwen3 Coder Next.
Benchmarks gegenereerd uit AI BENCHY-testsuites op: 2026-06-04
| Metriek | Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none | Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 Coder Next medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Rang | #138 | #150 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistentie | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 31.8% | 28.6% |
| Instabiele tests | 2 | 3 |
| Totaal runs | 63 | 63 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 0.005 | 0.201 |
| Totale kosten | $0.001 | $0.008 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.010 / 1M | $0.110 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.030 / 1M | $0.800 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 40,718 | 47,250 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 2,878 | 3,319 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 9.34s | 8.58s |
| Responstijd (max) | 35.34s | 81.80s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 177.48s | 128.68s |
Generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#150 Qwen3 Coder Next
medium
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.5 | 8.1 | 16.7% | 1 | 8.64s | 645 | 1,252 | 0 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.7 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 924ms | 7,185 | 336 | 0 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.34s | 20,818 | 1,069 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.28s | 20,469 | 317 | 0 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 81.80s | 7,758 | 246 | 0 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.95s | 810 | 24 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 638ms | 753 | 25 | 0 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.3 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.39s | 498 | 142 | 0 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 7.49s | 684 | 63 | 0 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.25s | 678 | 671 | 0 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.64s | 8,364 | 255 | 0 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling-2.6-flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 | |
| Qwen3 Coder Next | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 399ms | 216 | 12 | 0 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Trinity Large PreviewnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsMiMo-V2-FlashnoneMercury 2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-4o-mininonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-5.4 MininonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneLing-2.6-flashnonevsMistral Small 4mediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumMistral Small 4nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing-2.6-flashnonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumNemotron 3 SupernoneGratis beschikbaarvsQwen3 Coder Nextmedium