- Rang
- #318
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 661,367
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 235.35s
- Totale kosten
- $0.161
Granite 4.2 8B (high) vs Ling 2.6 Flash
Granite 4.2 8B (high) leidt in gemiddelde score met 4.7 vs 4.5. Ling 2.6 Flash heeft lagere benchmarkkosten met $0.002 vs $0.161. Ling 2.6 Flash is sneller met 10.21s vs 235.35s, met slagingspercentages van 37.7% vs 29.0%.
Vergeleken modellen
- Rang
- #329
- Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
- 14,903
- Responstijd (gem.)
- 10.21s
- Totale kosten
- $0.002
Aanbevolen model
Ling 2.6 Flash
De score blijft dicht bij de beste score hier (4.5 vs 4.7) en het kost ongeveer 115.9x minder dan Granite 4.2 8B (high).
Gedetailleerde vergelijking
| Metriek | Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B high | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Rang | #318 | #329 |
| Betrouwbaarheid | 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Consistentie | 6.4 | 9.3 |
| Pogingen | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Correcte tests | ||
| Slaagpercentage per poging | 37.7% | 29.0% |
| Instabiele tests | 10 | 2 |
| Totaal runs | 69 | 69 |
| Kosten per resultaat | 2.751 | 0.024 |
| Totale kosten | $0.161 | $0.002 |
| Invoerprijs | $0.060 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Uitvoerprijs | $0.250 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Totaal aantal invoer-tokens | 282,658 | 114,384 |
| Uitvoer-tokens | 198,563 | 14,903 |
| Redeneer-tokens | 462,804 | 0 |
| Responstijd (gem.) | 235.35s | 10.21s |
| Responstijd (max) | 685.87s | 36.03s |
| Responstijd (totaal) | 5413.09s | 214.31s |
| Parameters | 8B | 104B totaal (7.4B actief) |
| Beschikbaarheid | Open-source | Open-source |
Model generatie-showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#318 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B
high
Provider returned error
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 0.2s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#329 Ling 2.6 Flash
none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
- Kosten
- $0.000
- Tijd
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Topmodellen op score
Score vs totale kosten
Responstijd (gem.)
Score vs Responstijd (gem.)
Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Score vs Totaal aantal uitvoer-tokens
Categorie-uitsplitsing
| Agenttaken | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 223.46s | 239,380 | 17,480 | 31,672 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 32ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI-trucs | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 6.9 | 5.8 | 75.0% | 2 | 205.31s | 507 | 8,350 | 12,250 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.8 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 11.81s | 726 | 573 | 0 |
| Programmeren | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.8 | 4.3 | 33.3% | 2 | 515.34s | 7,047 | 42,438 | 154,749 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.21s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Gecombineerd | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 6.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 570.43s | 18,410 | 16,478 | 60,329 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 35.69s | 94,475 | 13,094 | 0 |
| Gegevensparsering en extractie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 56.55s | 6,779 | 1,368 | 3,999 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 8.48s | 8,004 | 246 | 0 |
| Domeinspecifiek | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 167.15s | 498 | 81,004 | 122,013 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.20s | 819 | 24 | 0 |
| Algemene intelligentie | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 16.37s | 534 | 5,762 | 5,800 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.45s | 540 | 109 | 0 |
| Instructies opvolgen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 87.47s | 483 | 2,191 | 13,223 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.52s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Puzzeloplossing | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 202.69s | 467 | 14,348 | 19,827 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 6.51s | 729 | 151 | 0 |
| Toolaanroepen | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.08s | 8,331 | 893 | 4,841 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 18.80s | 7,324 | 229 | 0 |
| Algemene kennis | Score | Consistentie | Slaagpercentage per poging | Instabiele tests | Correcte tests | Responstijd (gem.) | Invoer-tokens | Uitvoer-tokens | Redeneer-tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 252.49s | 222 | 8,251 | 34,101 | |
| Ling 2.6 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Snelle vergelijking
Vergelijkingspaar wisselen
Granite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1noneGratis beschikbaarNorth Mini CodenoneGratis beschikbaarvsGranite 4.2 8BhighGranite 4.2 8BhighvsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumGratis beschikbaarGranite 4.2 8BhighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneDeepSeek V3.2nonevsGranite 4.2 8BhighGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeLing 2.6 FlashnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowGratis beschikbaarLing 2.6 FlashnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowGratis beschikbaarGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1lowGratis beschikbaarGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowGratis beschikbaarGranite 4.2 8BhighvsGLM 4.7 Flashnone