Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.059 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 is faster at 6.70s vs 58.43s, with pass rates of 25.8% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.1It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 8.7x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.4 5.5
Rank #164 #157
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 25.8% 40.9%
Flaky tests 4 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.451 2.368
Total Cost $0.059 $0.164
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.200 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 86,641 124,209
Output Tokens 97,298 14,393
Reasoning Tokens 242,297 0
Response Time (avg) 58.43s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 560.31s 61.20s
Response Time (total) 1285.48s 147.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#164 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

#157 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair