Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 6.0 vs 5.6. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.030 vs $0.057. GLM 5.1 is faster at 4.10s vs 6.47s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 41.3%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low)It has the best score here (6.0), while costing about 1.9x less than GLM 5.1.

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 6.0 5.6
Rank #124 #141
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 41.3%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.427 0.843
Total Cost $0.030 $0.057
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,464 47,133
Output Tokens 4,227 3,754
Reasoning Tokens 34,864 0
Response Time (avg) 6.47s 4.10s
Response Time (max) 25.49s 32.57s
Response Time (total) 135.80s 86.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#141 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair