Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

Qwen3.5-Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.030. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 3.58s vs 6.47s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 39.7%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 7.2x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #124 #119
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 39.7%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.427 0.075
Total Cost $0.030 $0.005
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,464 46,439
Output Tokens 4,227 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 34,864 0
Response Time (avg) 6.47s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 25.49s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 135.80s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#119 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair