Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.073. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 25.28s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 39.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
11,118
Response Time (avg)
1.86s
Total Cost
$0.047
Rank
#140
Total Output Tokens
209,201
Response Time (avg)
25.28s
Total Cost
$0.073
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #134 #140
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 39.4%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.465 0.933
Total Cost $0.047 $0.073
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 119,065 282,347
Output Tokens 11,118 209,201
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.86s 25.28s
Response Time (max) 12.97s 480.96s
Response Time (total) 40.88s 556.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#134 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#140 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair