Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-Flash benchmark comparison: The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.013. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.33s vs 3.58s, with pass rates of 54.0% vs 39.7%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-Flash - It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 3.1x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #95 #97
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.0% 39.7%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.130 0.075
Total Cost $0.013 $0.005
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,973 46,439
Output Tokens 2,487 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.33s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 4.49s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 27.91s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#97 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 1.10s 500 639 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.5 8.3 8.3% 1 1.32s 696 690 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.53s 12,870 357 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.22s 18,879 1,794 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.04s 7,552 279 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.57s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 1.02s 641 15 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 905ms 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 791ms 490 63 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 803ms 522 100 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 932ms 615 72 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 8.81s 711 63 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 6.0 4.6 66.7% 2 2.15s 564 153 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 10.89s 714 579 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.51s 5,457 234 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.67s 8,211 264 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 724ms 158 9 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 588ms 210 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair