Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.062. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 3.74s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#131
Total Output Tokens
11,118
Response Time (avg)
1.86s
Total Cost
$0.047
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.0x faster than Qwen3.6 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #131 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 34.9%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.465 0.935
Total Cost $0.047 $0.062
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 119,065 139,788
Output Tokens 11,118 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.86s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 12.97s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 40.88s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#131 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair