Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

gpt-oss-120b (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.062. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
97,816
Response Time (avg)
21.91s
Total Cost
$0.019
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 5.9x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #132 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 34.9%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.221 0.935
Total Cost $0.019 $0.062
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,747 139,788
Output Tokens 29,772 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 68,044 0
Response Time (avg) 21.91s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 68.16s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 328.70s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#132 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair