Navigate
Advertise here

gpt-oss-120b (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.020. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 10.05s vs 20.81s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#198
Total Output Tokens
98,282
Response Time (avg)
20.81s
Total Cost
$0.020
Rank
#199
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.05s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.1x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #198 #199
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 36.4%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.224 0.262
Total Cost $0.020 $0.019
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,767 218,740
Output Tokens 29,378 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 68,904 0
Response Time (avg) 20.81s 10.05s
Response Time (max) 68.16s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 332.88s 221.13s
Parameters 117B total (5.1B active) ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#198 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

#199 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair