Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

gpt-oss-120b (medium) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.7 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.019. Qwen3.7 Flash is faster at 10.06s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 36.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
97,816
Response Time (avg)
21.91s
Total Cost
$0.019
Rank
#136
Total Output Tokens
90,507
Response Time (avg)
10.06s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.2x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash none Release: 2026-07-28
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #135 #136
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 36.4%
Flaky tests 5 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.221 0.262
Total Cost $0.019 $0.019
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,747 218,731
Output Tokens 29,772 90,507
Reasoning Tokens 68,044 0
Response Time (avg) 21.91s 10.06s
Response Time (max) 68.16s 186.24s
Response Time (total) 328.70s 221.34s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#135 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

#136 Qwen3.7 Flash

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
34.0s
Tokens
4,814 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973
Qwen3.7 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.55s 7,911 855 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair