Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.047. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 50.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 11.8x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #120 #121
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 50.0%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.465 0.221
Total Cost $0.047 $0.019
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 119,065 108,747
Output Tokens 11,118 29,772
Reasoning Tokens 0 68,044
Response Time (avg) 1.86s 21.91s
Response Time (max) 12.97s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 40.88s 328.70s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#120 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#121 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair