Navigate
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite vs gpt-oss-120b (medium)

Seed-2.0-Lite leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $0.066. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.37s vs 20.81s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#188
Total Output Tokens
14,744
Response Time (avg)
4.37s
Total Cost
$0.066
Rank
#194
Total Output Tokens
98,282
Response Time (avg)
20.81s
Total Cost
$0.020
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 4.8x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #188 #194
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 50.0%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.813 0.224
Total Cost $0.066 $0.020
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,206 108,767
Output Tokens 14,744 29,378
Reasoning Tokens 0 68,904
Response Time (avg) 4.37s 20.81s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 96.20s 332.88s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 117B total (5.1B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#188 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#194 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair