Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.187. Inkling (low) is faster at 5.15s vs 25.28s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 54.6%.

Recommended modelInkling (low)It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 4.9x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24 Inkling Inkling low Release: 2026-07-18
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #121 #119
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.3 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 54.6%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.933 1.866
Total Cost $0.073 $0.187
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 282,347 109,884
Output Tokens 209,201 8,579
Reasoning Tokens 0 10,343
Response Time (avg) 25.28s 5.15s
Response Time (max) 480.96s 41.58s
Response Time (total) 556.24s 113.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

#119 Thinking Machines: Inkling

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
6.1s
Tokens
502 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Inkling 5.1 7.2 22.2% 1 8.71s 7,374 355 4,961

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair