Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.187. Inkling (low) is faster at 5.15s vs 12.72s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 54.6%.

Recommended modelInkling (low)It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 2.5x faster than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24 Inkling Inkling low Release: 2026-07-18
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #123 #119
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 54.6%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.578 1.866
Total Cost $0.106 $0.187
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,521 109,884
Output Tokens 86,614 8,579
Reasoning Tokens 0 10,343
Response Time (avg) 12.72s 5.15s
Response Time (max) 209.15s 41.58s
Response Time (total) 279.90s 113.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#123 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

#119 Thinking Machines: Inkling

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
6.1s
Tokens
502 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0
Inkling 5.1 7.2 22.2% 1 8.71s 7,374 355 4,961

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair