Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs StepFun: Step 3.5 Flash

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.108. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is faster at 12.72s vs 174.22s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 51.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-35B-A3BIt has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 13.7x faster than Step 3.5 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24 Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium Release: 2026-02-01
Score 6.1 6.0
Rank #120 #123
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 8.6 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 51.5%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 1.578 0.540
Total Cost $0.106 $0.108
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.000 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 134,521 65,707
Output Tokens 86,614 108,561
Reasoning Tokens 0 293,993
Response Time (avg) 12.72s 174.22s
Response Time (max) 209.15s 1597.85s
Response Time (total) 279.90s 2613.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#120 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

#123 Step 3.5 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
277.1s
Tokens
23,695 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0
Step 3.5 Flash 2.4 5.2 0.0% 0 258.38s 2,211 13,207 22,429

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair