Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $0.114. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is faster at 12.72s vs 54.87s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-35B-A3BIt has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 4.3x faster than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #121 #120
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 43.9%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.267 1.578
Total Cost $0.114 $0.106
Input Price $0.050 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,935 134,521
Output Tokens 12,042 86,614
Reasoning Tokens 261,056 0
Response Time (avg) 54.87s 12.72s
Response Time (max) 227.89s 209.15s
Response Time (total) 822.99s 279.90s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

#120 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair