- Rank
- #253
- Total Output Tokens
- 943,044
- Response Time (avg)
- 74.52s
- Total Cost
- $0.645
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. GPT-5 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.139 vs $0.645. GPT-5 Nano (medium) is faster at 56.55s vs 74.52s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 53.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #254
- Total Output Tokens
- 307,921
- Response Time (avg)
- 56.55s
- Total Cost
- $0.139
Recommended model
GPT-5 Nano (medium)
It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 4.6x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Rank | #253 | #254 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.3 | 6.5 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 42.0% | 53.6% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 10 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 11.289 | 1.737 |
| Total Cost | $0.645 | $0.139 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.050 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 283,116 | 314,436 |
| Output Tokens | 277,920 | 13,578 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 665,124 | 294,343 |
| Response Time (avg) | 74.52s | 56.55s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 227.89s |
| Response Time (total) | 1713.90s | 961.32s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | ~120B total (~5B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#253 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#254 GPT-5 Nano
medium- Cost
- $0.006
- Time
- 108.5s
- Tokens
- 13,209 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 44.97s | 181,340 | 1,553 | 8,872 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 94.09s | 219,492 | 1,541 | 23,943 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 6.5 | 7.9 | 58.3% | 1 | 25.50s | 606 | 1,221 | 21,184 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 7.0 | 7.7 | 55.6% | 1 | 41.62s | 7,305 | 740 | 41,152 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 6.4 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 146.93s | 71,846 | 7,156 | 86,976 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.7 | 1.7 | 50.0% | 2 | 21.42s | 7,140 | 453 | 10,560 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.4 | 1.6 | 44.4% | 3 | 124.13s | 628 | 232 | 73,792 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 4.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 17.51s | 477 | 202 | 4,608 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.64s | 660 | 312 | 4,736 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 20.63s | 642 | 929 | 14,272 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 33.30s | 5,445 | 558 | 6,976 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| GPT-5 Nano | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 20.13s | 195 | 234 | 6,144 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing 2.6 1tmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 MininoneSeed 2.1 TurbononevsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSeed 2.1 TurbononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 FlashhighvsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnoneDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableGPT-5 NanomediumvsSpace Bunny Alphalow