Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash (high) vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.8 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.139. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) is faster at 13.08s vs 56.55s, with pass rates of 60.9% vs 53.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#251
Total Output Tokens
299,456
Response Time (avg)
13.08s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#254
Total Output Tokens
307,921
Response Time (avg)
56.55s
Total Cost
$0.139
Recommended model Ling 3.0 Flash (high)

It has the best score here (5.8), while responding about 4.3x faster than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 5.8 5.7
Rank #251 #254
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.6 6.5
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.9% 53.6%
Flaky tests 4 10
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 1.737
Total Cost $0.000 $0.139
Input Price $0.021 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.063 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,044 314,436
Output Tokens 92,135 13,578
Reasoning Tokens 207,321 294,343
Response Time (avg) 13.08s 56.55s
Response Time (max) 75.27s 227.89s
Response Time (total) 287.79s 961.32s
Parameters 124B total (5.1B active) ~120B total (~5B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#251 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

#254 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair