Navigate
Advertise here

Gemma 4 31B vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)

GPT-5 Nano (medium) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.7. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.030 vs $0.139. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 7.28s vs 56.55s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 53.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#258
Total Output Tokens
15,499
Response Time (avg)
7.28s
Total Cost
$0.030
Rank
#254
Total Output Tokens
307,921
Response Time (avg)
56.55s
Total Cost
$0.139
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.7 vs 5.7), while costing about 4.7x less than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #258 #254
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 6.5
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.0% 53.6%
Flaky tests 1 10
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.520 1.737
Total Cost $0.030 $0.139
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 270,970 314,436
Output Tokens 15,499 13,578
Reasoning Tokens 0 294,343
Response Time (avg) 7.28s 56.55s
Response Time (max) 44.73s 227.89s
Response Time (total) 152.84s 961.32s
Parameters 30.7B ~120B total (~5B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#258 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#254 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair