- Rank
- #253
- Total Output Tokens
- 943,044
- Response Time (avg)
- 74.52s
- Total Cost
- $0.645
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Gemma 4 31B
Trinity Large Thinking (high) leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.7. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.030 vs $0.645. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 7.28s vs 74.52s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 42.0%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #258
- Total Output Tokens
- 15,499
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.28s
- Total Cost
- $0.030
Recommended model
Gemma 4 31B
Its score stays close to the best score here (5.7 vs 5.7), while costing about 21.7x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Rank | #253 | #258 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 42.0% | 42.0% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 11.289 | 0.520 |
| Total Cost | $0.645 | $0.030 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.090 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.340 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 283,116 | 270,970 |
| Output Tokens | 277,920 | 15,499 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 665,124 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 74.52s | 7.28s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 44.73s |
| Response Time (total) | 1713.90s | 152.84s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 30.7B |
| Availability | Weights available | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#253 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#258 Gemma 4 31B
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 12.8s
- Tokens
- 795 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 44.97s | 181,340 | 1,553 | 8,872 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.9 | 9.6 | 0.0% | 0 | 44.73s | 145,267 | 2,182 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.85s | 852 | 45 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.19s | 8,381 | 735 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 29.95s | 104,817 | 11,910 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.25s | 8,352 | 285 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.65s | 878 | 27 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.09s | 576 | 117 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 2.84s | 795 | 78 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.23s | 828 | 108 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.25s | 224 | 12 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing 2.6 1tmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 MininoneDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailablevsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsSpace Bunny AlphalowTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSeed 2.1 TurbononeTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsDeepSeek V4.1 FlashnoneGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsRing 2.6 1tmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSpace Bunny Alphalow