- Rank
- #258
- Total Output Tokens
- 15,499
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.28s
- Total Cost
- $0.030
Gemma 4 31B vs Space Bunny Alpha (low)
The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. Space Bunny Alpha (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.030. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 7.28s vs 30.63s, with pass rates of 42.0% vs 53.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #259
- Total Output Tokens
- 194,450
- Response Time (avg)
- 30.63s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Gemma 4 31B
It has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 4.2x faster than Space Bunny Alpha (low).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Free Available | Space Bunny Alpha Space Bunny Alpha low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Rank | #258 | #259 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 6.5 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 42.0% | 53.6% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 10 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.520 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.030 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.090 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.340 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 270,970 | 289,086 |
| Output Tokens | 15,499 | 194,450 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 7.28s | 30.63s |
| Response Time (max) | 44.73s | 340.88s |
| Response Time (total) | 152.84s | 704.47s |
| Parameters | 30.7B | - |
| Availability | Open source | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#258 Gemma 4 31B
none- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 12.8s
- Tokens
- 795 tok
#259 Space Bunny Alpha
low- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 20.6s
- Tokens
- 3,462 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.9 | 9.6 | 0.0% | 0 | 44.73s | 145,267 | 2,182 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.7 | 3.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 89.00s | 169,129 | 10,896 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.85s | 852 | 45 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.9 | 5.8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2.75s | 2,130 | 2,255 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 11.19s | 8,381 | 735 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 5.6 | 4.7 | 55.6% | 2 | 6.60s | 8,493 | 5,897 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 29.95s | 104,817 | 11,910 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 12.17s | 85,984 | 8,071 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.25s | 8,352 | 285 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.35s | 7,890 | 401 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.65s | 878 | 27 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 65.69s | 1,869 | 61,188 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.09s | 576 | 117 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.4 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.78s | 855 | 427 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 2.84s | 795 | 78 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.4 | 2.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 1.43s | 1,425 | 351 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 6.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.23s | 828 | 108 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 7.9 | 9.9 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.51s | 1,782 | 1,939 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3.48s | 8,953 | 370 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma 4 31B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.25s | 224 | 12 | 0 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 340.88s | 576 | 102,655 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
GPT-5.4nonevsSpace Bunny AlphalowDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailablevsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableSpace Bunny AlphalowvsSolar Pro 4noneDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailablevsSpace Bunny AlphalowGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsGPT-5 NanomediumSeed 2.1 TurbononevsSpace Bunny AlphalowTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailablevsRing 2.6 1tmediumGPT-5.4 MininonevsSpace Bunny AlphalowSpace Bunny AlphalowvsGLM 5noneGPT-5 NanomediumvsSpace Bunny AlphalowTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsSpace Bunny Alphalow