Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.106. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is faster at 12.72s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 50.0% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelgpt-oss-120b (medium)It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 5.6x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #115 #120
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.0 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 50.0% 43.9%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.221 1.578
Total Cost $0.019 $0.106
Input Price $0.037 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.170 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,747 134,521
Output Tokens 29,772 86,614
Reasoning Tokens 68,044 0
Response Time (avg) 21.91s 12.72s
Response Time (max) 68.16s 209.15s
Response Time (total) 328.70s 279.90s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

#120 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
28.4s
Tokens
4,518 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.39s 7,808 571 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair