Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemma 4 31B vs gpt-oss-120b (medium)

Gemma 4 31B leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.023. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 5.34s vs 21.91s, with pass rates of 48.5% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#126
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.34s
Total Cost
$0.023
Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
97,816
Response Time (avg)
21.91s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

It has the best score here (6.2), while responding about 4.1x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #126 #132
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 48.5% 50.0%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.330 0.221
Total Cost $0.023 $0.019
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,728 108,747
Output Tokens 13,317 29,772
Reasoning Tokens 0 68,044
Response Time (avg) 5.34s 21.91s
Response Time (max) 29.95s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 106.82s 328.70s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#126 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#132 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair