Navigate
Advertise here

Gemma 4 31B vs gpt-oss-120b (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.020. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 5.41s vs 20.81s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#205
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.41s
Total Cost
$0.016
Rank
#198
Total Output Tokens
98,282
Response Time (avg)
20.81s
Total Cost
$0.020
Recommended model Gemma 4 31B

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 3.8x faster than gpt-oss-120b (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #205 #198
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 8.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 50.0%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.366 0.224
Total Cost $0.016 $0.020
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,703 108,767
Output Tokens 13,317 29,378
Reasoning Tokens 0 68,904
Response Time (avg) 5.41s 20.81s
Response Time (max) 29.95s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 108.12s 332.88s
Parameters 30.7B 117B total (5.1B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#205 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#198 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair