Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The average score is effectively tied at 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.187. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 5.15s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 54.6%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 3.1x less than Inkling (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20 Inkling Inkling low Release: 2026-07-18
Score 6.1 6.1
Rank #120 #119
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 54.6%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.935 1.866
Total Cost $0.062 $0.187
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 139,788 109,884
Output Tokens 30,947 8,579
Reasoning Tokens 0 10,343
Response Time (avg) 3.74s 5.15s
Response Time (max) 48.79s 41.58s
Response Time (total) 82.38s 113.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#120 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

#119 Thinking Machines: Inkling

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
6.1s
Tokens
502 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0
Inkling 5.1 7.2 22.2% 1 8.71s 7,374 355 4,961

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair