Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.139 vs $0.187. Inkling (low) is faster at 5.15s vs 84.82s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 54.6%.

Recommended modelInkling (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while responding about 16.5x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24 Inkling Inkling low Release: 2026-07-18
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #110 #119
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.8 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 54.6%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.361 1.866
Total Cost $0.139 $0.187
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,499 109,884
Output Tokens 12,284 8,579
Reasoning Tokens 490,610 10,343
Response Time (avg) 84.82s 5.15s
Response Time (max) 515.38s 41.58s
Response Time (total) 1781.22s 113.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

#119 Thinking Machines: Inkling

low
Cost
$0.002
Time
6.1s
Tokens
502 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081
Inkling 5.1 7.2 22.2% 1 8.71s 7,374 355 4,961

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair