- Rank
- #164
- Total Output Tokens
- 121,223
- Response Time (avg)
- 58.14s
- Total Cost
- $2.405
Ember-1 (high) vs Inkling (low)
Ember-1 (high) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.8. Inkling (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.304 vs $2.405. Inkling (low) is faster at 6.81s vs 58.14s, with pass rates of 71.0% vs 56.5%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #170
- Total Output Tokens
- 22,037
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.81s
- Total Cost
- $0.304
Recommended model
Inkling (low)
Its score stays close to the best score here (6.8 vs 6.9), while costing about 7.9x less than Ember-1 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ember-1 Ember-1 high | Inkling Inkling low Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.9 | 6.8 |
| Rank | #164 | #170 |
| Reliability | 8.6 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.0% | 56.5% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 20.041 | 2.756 |
| Total Cost | $2.405 | $0.304 |
| Input Price | $3.000 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $15.000 / 1M | $4.050 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 195,489 | 213,901 |
| Output Tokens | 12,475 | 9,623 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 108,748 | 12,414 |
| Response Time (avg) | 58.14s | 6.81s |
| Response Time (max) | 255.06s | 44.24s |
| Response Time (total) | 1337.19s | 156.70s |
| Parameters | ~2.8T total (~104B active) | 975B total (41B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#164 Ember-1
high- Cost
- $0.038
- Time
- 55.1s
- Tokens
- 2,671 tok
#170 Thinking Machines: Inkling
low- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 6.1s
- Tokens
- 502 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Qwen3.5-FlashmediumvsInklinglowFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsInklinglowFree AvailableEmber-1highvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumEmber-1highvsGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailableEmber-1highvsGPT-5.6 LunalowKimi K2.6mediumvsInklinglowFree AvailableGPT-6 SolnonevsInklinglowFree AvailableClaude Sonnet 5.5lowvsEmber-1highClaude Opus 4.8nonevsEmber-1highEmber-1highvsKimi K2.6mediumGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailablevsInklinglowFree AvailableEmber-1highvsQwen3.5-Flashmedium