Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) vs Ember-1 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.9 vs 6.9. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.909 vs $2.405. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) is faster at 7.46s vs 58.14s, with pass rates of 46.4% vs 71.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#167
Total Output Tokens
32,443
Response Time (avg)
7.46s
Total Cost
$0.909
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
121,223
Response Time (avg)
58.14s
Total Cost
$2.405
Recommended model Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low)

It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 2.6x less than Ember-1 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 low Release: 2026-09-29 Ember-1 Ember-1 high Release: 2026-09-28
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #167 #164
Reliability 10.0 8.6
Consistency 9.4 7.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.4% 71.0%
Flaky tests 2 8
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 9.082 20.041
Total Cost $0.909 $2.405
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $15.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 291,853 195,489
Output Tokens 24,116 12,475
Reasoning Tokens 8,327 108,748
Response Time (avg) 7.46s 58.14s
Response Time (max) 46.61s 255.06s
Response Time (total) 171.47s 1337.19s
Parameters ~1T total (~100B active) ~2.8T total (~104B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#167 Claude Sonnet 5.5

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
15.3s
Tokens
2,077 tok

#164 Ember-1

high
Cost
$0.038
Time
55.1s
Tokens
2,671 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 3.2 9.7 0.0% 0 5.81s 10,608 5,903 0
Ember-1 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 72.23s 7,144 1,281 23,093

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair