Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low) leads on average score with 6.0 vs 5.9. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.030. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 1.68s vs 6.47s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 38.1%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-27BIts score stays close to the best score here (5.9 vs 6.0), while costing about 2.1x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.0 5.9
Rank #124 #128
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 38.1%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.427 0.249
Total Cost $0.030 $0.015
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,464 44,478
Output Tokens 4,227 3,592
Reasoning Tokens 34,864 0
Response Time (avg) 6.47s 1.68s
Response Time (max) 25.49s 9.39s
Response Time (total) 135.80s 35.25s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#124 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

low
Cost
$0.004
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,008 tok

#128 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.5 7.3 11.1% 1 11.06s 7,893 2,001 13,623
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair