Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.045. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 3.58s vs 8.28s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 39.7%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5-FlashIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 10.9x less than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #115 #119
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 39.7%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.562 0.075
Total Cost $0.045 $0.005
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 42,750 46,439
Output Tokens 7,759 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 56,357 0
Response Time (avg) 8.28s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 173.80s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#119 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair