#110 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5
high
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Summary
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.064. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 3.58s vs 11.02s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 39.7%.
Last updated at: 2026-07-14
| Metric | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high | Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Rank | #110 | #119 |
| Reliability | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 46.0% | 39.7% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 0.910 | 0.075 |
| Total Cost | $0.064 | $0.005 |
| Input Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.065 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.600 / 1M | $0.260 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 41,748 | 46,439 |
| Output Tokens | 3,894 | 4,276 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 91,773 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 11.02s | 3.58s |
| Response Time (max) | 104.98s | 27.18s |
| Response Time (total) | 231.37s | 75.28s |
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 11.1% | 1 | 39.07s | 6,948 | 1,166 | 55,883 | |
| Qwen3.5-Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 850ms | 7,913 | 519 | 0 |
Switch Comparison Pair