Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Summary

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.064 vs $0.401. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) is faster at 11.02s vs 72.57s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 69.8%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 6.3x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #110 #108
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.6 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 69.8%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.910 5.162
Total Cost $0.064 $0.401
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 41,748 42,196
Output Tokens 3,894 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 91,773 353,577
Response Time (avg) 11.02s 72.57s
Response Time (max) 104.98s 409.98s
Response Time (total) 231.37s 1524.04s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#110 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#108 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair