Navigate
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.1. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $1.148. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.37s vs 110.84s, with pass rates of 40.9% vs 65.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#192
Total Output Tokens
14,744
Response Time (avg)
4.37s
Total Cost
$0.066
Rank
#197
Total Output Tokens
893,463
Response Time (avg)
110.84s
Total Cost
$1.148
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 17.6x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #192 #197
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.9% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.813 9.806
Total Cost $0.066 $1.148
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.313 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,206 130,450
Output Tokens 14,744 54,857
Reasoning Tokens 0 838,606
Response Time (avg) 4.37s 110.84s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 96.20s 2438.58s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 35B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#192 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#197 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair