Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.837. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#130
Total Output Tokens
14,746
Response Time (avg)
4.40s
Total Cost
$0.066
Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
826,670
Response Time (avg)
112.47s
Total Cost
$0.837
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 12.9x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.2
Rank #130 #133
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 66.7%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 9.130
Total Cost $0.066 $0.837
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 130,388
Output Tokens 14,746 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#133 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair