Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Summary

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.401. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 2.49s vs 72.57s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 69.8%.

Recommended model: Seed-2.0-Lite - Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 22.0x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #93 #88
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 7.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 69.8%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.228 5.162
Total Cost $0.019 $0.401
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,573 42,196
Output Tokens 3,259 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 353,577
Response Time (avg) 2.49s 72.57s
Response Time (max) 6.70s 409.98s
Response Time (total) 52.26s 1524.04s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#93 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#88 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 5.9 16.7% 2 2.43s 894 709 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.13s 672 798 42,652
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.59s 16,215 498 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 4.7 1.6 66.7% 1 75.34s 20,992 775 12,485
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.82s 8,538 246 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 7.3 5.9 83.3% 1 59.33s 6,061 235 19,493
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 1.33s 939 17 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 4.1 4.4 44.5% 2 88.34s 500 41 46,368
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.45s 570 294 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 30.30s 172 20 3,753
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.06s 810 73 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 24.45s 699 97 17,361
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 2.78s 858 709 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 33.13s 597 3,592 26,585
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.94s 9,270 292 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.65s 8,193 309 1,365
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.96s 264 11 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 177.35s 204 10,919 72,053

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.5nonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumDeepSeek V4 ProhighvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumDeepSeek V4 PrononevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalSeed-2.0-LitenonevsDeepSeek V4 ProhighSeed-2.0-LitenonevsGemma 4 31BmediumFree AvailableSeed-2.0-LitenonevsNemotron 3 SupermediumFree AvailableGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewnonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitenonevsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium