Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Summary

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Gemma 4 31B benchmark comparison: Gemma 4 31B leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.033. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 2.49s vs 56.55s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 69.8%.

Recommended model: Seed-2.0-Lite - Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 1.8x less than Gemma 4 31B.

Last updated at: 2026-06-12

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #93 #87
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 69.8%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.228 0.257
Total Cost $0.019 $0.033
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.350 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,573 17,957
Output Tokens 3,259 22,356
Reasoning Tokens 0 65,726
Response Time (avg) 2.49s 56.55s
Response Time (max) 6.70s 437.40s
Response Time (total) 52.26s 1074.41s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#93 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#87 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 5.9 16.7% 2 2.43s 894 709 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.89s 816 962 2,046
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.59s 16,215 498 0
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.82s 8,538 246 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.11s 8,334 1,822 2,951
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 1.33s 939 17 0
Gemma 4 31B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 38.48s 876 4,349 8,985
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.45s 570 294 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.57s 567 105 888
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.06s 810 73 0
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.76s 777 533 2,035
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 2.78s 858 709 0
Gemma 4 31B 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 26.91s 801 1,795 5,595
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.94s 9,270 292 0
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.96s 264 11 0
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 90.14s 218 1,692 10,014

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair