Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite vs Gemma 4 31B (medium)

Gemma 4 31B (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.116. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#130
Total Output Tokens
14,746
Response Time (avg)
4.40s
Total Cost
$0.066
Rank
#124
Total Output Tokens
257,746
Response Time (avg)
75.38s
Total Cost
$0.116
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.2 vs 6.3), while costing about 1.8x less than Gemma 4 31B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #130 #124
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 68.2%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 1.044
Total Cost $0.066 $0.116
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 94,992
Output Tokens 14,746 34,468
Reasoning Tokens 0 223,278
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 75.38s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 437.40s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 1507.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#124 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair