Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Summary

Seed-2.0-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna (low) benchmark comparison: The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.141. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 2.49s vs 4.35s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 57.1%.

Recommended model: Seed-2.0-Lite - It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 7.7x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09
Score 6.2 6.2
Rank #106 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.4 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 57.1%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.228 1.404
Total Cost $0.019 $0.141
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,573 34,218
Output Tokens 3,259 2,110
Reasoning Tokens 0 15,571
Response Time (avg) 2.49s 4.35s
Response Time (max) 6.70s 18.06s
Response Time (total) 52.26s 91.45s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#106 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#107 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 5.9 16.7% 2 2.43s 894 709 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 2.21s 606 186 722
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.59s 16,215 498 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 7.99s 11,019 300 1,060
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.82s 8,538 246 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.14s 7,140 234 292
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 1.33s 939 17 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 10.05s 723 70 6,718
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.45s 570 294 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.25s 477 122 169
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.06s 810 73 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 8.5 6.8 83.3% 1 2.04s 660 93 259
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 2.78s 858 709 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 3.59s 642 271 1,207
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.94s 9,270 292 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.43s 5,454 250 177
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.96s 264 11 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.86s 195 27 1,432

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair