Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

GPT-5.5 leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.2. GPT-5.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.544 vs $0.837. GPT-5.5 is faster at 2.36s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 56.1% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
4,915
Response Time (avg)
2.36s
Total Cost
$0.544
Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
826,670
Response Time (avg)
112.47s
Total Cost
$0.837
Recommended model GPT-5.5

It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 1.5x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.9 6.2
Rank #98 #133
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 56.1% 66.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.945 9.130
Total Cost $0.544 $0.837
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,285 130,388
Output Tokens 4,915 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 2.36s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 12.24s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 51.88s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#98 GPT-5.5

none
Cost
$0.090
Time
54.3s
Tokens
3,063 tok

#133 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,305 462 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair