Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.2. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.837. Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 6.20s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
1,890
Response Time (avg)
6.20s
Total Cost
$0.017
Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
826,670
Response Time (avg)
112.47s
Total Cost
$0.837
Recommended model Gemini 2.5 Flash

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 50.1x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none Release: 2025-06-17 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.2
Rank #132 #133
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 66.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.186 9.130
Total Cost $0.017 $0.837
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 39,877 130,388
Output Tokens 1,890 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 6.20s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 118.00s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 136.37s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#132 Gemini 2.5 Flash

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.164
Time
215.5s
Tokens
65,659 tok

#133 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 736ms 8,122 483 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair