Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium)

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower benchmark cost at $0.095 vs $0.837. Nemotron 3 Ultra is faster at 3.87s vs 112.47s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#144
Total Output Tokens
9,474
Response Time (avg)
3.87s
Total Cost
$0.095
Rank
#133
Total Output Tokens
826,670
Response Time (avg)
112.47s
Total Cost
$0.837
Recommended model Nemotron 3 Ultra

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 8.8x less than Qwen3.5-35B-A3B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Nemotron 3 Ultra Nemotron 3 Ultra none Release: 2026-06-04 Free Available Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.2
Rank #144 #133
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 9.130
Total Cost $0.095 $0.837
Input Price $0.600 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $3.600 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,275 130,388
Output Tokens 9,474 40,630
Reasoning Tokens 0 786,040
Response Time (avg) 3.87s 112.47s
Response Time (max) 37.50s 950.25s
Response Time (total) 85.15s 2474.28s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#144 Nemotron 3 Ultra

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
149.6s
Tokens
3,405 tok

#133 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
71.4s
Tokens
8,631 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Ultra 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.02s 7,623 369 0
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 5.9 9.3 33.3% 0 206.65s 4,106 23,844 111,462

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair