Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower benchmark cost at $0.095 vs $0.139. Nemotron 3 Ultra is faster at 3.87s vs 84.82s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelNemotron 3 UltraIts score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while responding about 21.9x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Nemotron 3 Ultra Nemotron 3 Ultra none Release: 2026-06-04 Free Available Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.2
Rank #129 #114
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 69.7%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.361
Total Cost $0.095 $0.139
Input Price $0.600 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $3.600 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,275 118,499
Output Tokens 9,474 12,284
Reasoning Tokens 0 490,610
Response Time (avg) 3.87s 84.82s
Response Time (max) 37.50s 515.38s
Response Time (total) 85.15s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#129 Nemotron 3 Ultra

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
149.6s
Tokens
3,405 tok

#114 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Ultra 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.02s 7,623 369 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair