Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.139. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 84.82s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 3.0x less than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.2
Rank #114 #108
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 69.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.465 1.361
Total Cost $0.047 $0.139
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 119,065 118,499
Output Tokens 11,118 12,284
Reasoning Tokens 0 490,610
Response Time (avg) 1.86s 84.82s
Response Time (max) 12.97s 515.38s
Response Time (total) 40.88s 1781.22s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#108 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair