Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) vs Qwen3.5-Flash benchmark comparison: GPT-5.6 Luna (low) leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.141. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 3.58s vs 4.35s, with pass rates of 57.1% vs 39.7%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-Flash - Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.2), while costing about 34.0x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #107 #112
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.1% 39.7%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.404 0.075
Total Cost $0.141 $0.005
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,218 46,439
Output Tokens 2,110 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 15,571 0
Response Time (avg) 4.35s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 18.06s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 91.45s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#107 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
10.2s
Tokens
1,897 tok

#112 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 2.21s 606 186 722
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.5 8.3 8.3% 1 1.32s 696 690 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 7.99s 11,019 300 1,060
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.22s 18,879 1,794 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.14s 7,140 234 292
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.57s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.6 7.2 22.2% 1 10.05s 723 70 6,718
Qwen3.5-Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 905ms 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.25s 477 122 169
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 803ms 522 100 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 8.5 6.8 83.3% 1 2.04s 660 93 259
Qwen3.5-Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 8.81s 711 63 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 3.59s 642 271 1,207
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 10.89s 714 579 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.43s 5,454 250 177
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.67s 8,211 264 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.86s 195 27 1,432
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 588ms 210 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair