Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.5. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.077 vs $0.164. GLM 5.1 is faster at 6.70s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)It has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 2.1x less than GLM 5.1.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #137 #144
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 40.9%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.097 2.368
Total Cost $0.077 $0.164
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 50,470 124,209
Output Tokens 3,957 14,393
Reasoning Tokens 111,374 0
Response Time (avg) 15.90s 6.70s
Response Time (max) 118.35s 61.20s
Response Time (total) 349.71s 147.38s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#137 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#144 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair