Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.6. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.077. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 43.9%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 4.6x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14
Score 5.7 5.6
Rank #149 #152
Reliability 9.9 9.9
Consistency 10.0 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 43.9%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.097
Total Cost $0.000 $0.077
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 50,470
Output Tokens 12,783 3,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 111,374
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 15.90s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 118.35s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 349.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#152 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair