- Rank
- #293
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,302
- Response Time (avg)
- 3.34s
- Total Cost
- $0.020
Mercury 2.5 (low) vs KAT Coder AIR V2.5 (high)
KAT Coder AIR V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.2 vs 5.1. Mercury 2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $0.077. Mercury 2.5 (low) is faster at 3.34s vs 15.23s, with pass rates of 37.7% vs 40.6%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #288
- Total Output Tokens
- 114,654
- Response Time (avg)
- 15.23s
- Total Cost
- $0.077
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 (low)
Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.2), while costing about 4.0x less than KAT Coder AIR V2.5 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 Mercury 2.5 low | KAT Coder AIR V2.5 KAT Coder AIR V2.5 high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Rank | #293 | #288 |
| Reliability | 9.8 | 9.8 |
| Consistency | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 37.7% | 40.6% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 5 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.319 | 1.091 |
| Total Cost | $0.020 | $0.077 |
| Input Price | $0.040 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 326,083 | 50,423 |
| Output Tokens | 7,224 | 4,144 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 33,078 | 110,510 |
| Response Time (avg) | 3.34s | 15.23s |
| Response Time (max) | 47.06s | 118.35s |
| Response Time (total) | 76.80s | 350.26s |
| Parameters | ~100B | ~35B total (~3B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#293 Mercury 2.5
low- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 2.4s
- Tokens
- 1,236 tok
#288 KAT Coder AIR V2.5
high
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.06s | 188,063 | 1,141 | 5,442 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.10s | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 6.9 | 7.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 799ms | 772 | 209 | 2,969 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2.49s | 615 | 204 | 1,290 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 972ms | 7,909 | 521 | 2,269 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 11.1% | 1 | 39.07s | 6,948 | 1,166 | 55,883 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.16s | 107,683 | 3,750 | 11,351 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 74.48s | 23,854 | 485 | 28,559 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 8,322 | 739 | 1,499 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.59s | 7,776 | 284 | 2,140 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 846ms | 851 | 57 | 2,265 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.28s | 724 | 1,101 | 7,738 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 4.4 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 819ms | 525 | 99 | 748 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 5.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 7.10s | 516 | 179 | 539 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 16.7% | 1 | 972ms | 518 | 48 | 1,026 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.51s | 699 | 90 | 675 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.9 | 4.5 | 66.7% | 2 | 792ms | 768 | 249 | 2,214 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 33.3% | 2 | 2.47s | 696 | 285 | 1,576 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.72s | 10,440 | 388 | 2,537 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.77s | 8,391 | 330 | 1,082 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 782ms | 232 | 23 | 758 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 21.72s | 204 | 20 | 11,028 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mercury 2.5lowvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumMercury 2.5lowvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeMercury 2.5lowvsMistral Small 4noneMercury 2.5lowvsMistral Small 4mediumLing 3.0 FlashnonevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5highKAT Coder AIR V2.5highvsInkling SmalllowFree AvailableKAT Coder AIR V2.5highvsMistral Small 4mediumKAT Coder AIR V2.5highvsMistral Small 4noneMercury 2.5lowvsLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailableKAT Coder AIR V2.5highvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeMercury 2.5lowvsNemotron 3.5 LightninghighFree AvailableMercury 2.5lowvsLing 3.0 Flashnone