- Rank
- #293
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,302
- Response Time (avg)
- 3.34s
- Total Cost
- $0.020
Mercury 2.5 (low) vs KAT Coder AIR V2.5 (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 5.1 vs 5.1. Mercury 2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $0.048. Mercury 2.5 (low) is faster at 3.34s vs 8.32s, with pass rates of 37.7% vs 43.5%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #294
- Total Output Tokens
- 66,576
- Response Time (avg)
- 8.32s
- Total Cost
- $0.048
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 (low)
It has the best score here (5.1), while costing about 2.5x less than KAT Coder AIR V2.5 (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 Mercury 2.5 low | KAT Coder AIR V2.5 KAT Coder AIR V2.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Rank | #293 | #294 |
| Reliability | 9.8 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 37.7% | 43.5% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.319 | 0.596 |
| Total Cost | $0.020 | $0.048 |
| Input Price | $0.040 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 326,083 | 51,369 |
| Output Tokens | 7,224 | 8,008 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 33,078 | 58,568 |
| Response Time (avg) | 3.34s | 8.32s |
| Response Time (max) | 47.06s | 48.19s |
| Response Time (total) | 76.80s | 191.40s |
| Parameters | ~100B | ~35B total (~3B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#293 Mercury 2.5
low- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 2.4s
- Tokens
- 1,236 tok
#294 KAT Coder AIR V2.5
medium- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 23.7s
- Tokens
- 4,924 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.06s | 188,063 | 1,141 | 5,442 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.05s | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 6.9 | 7.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 799ms | 772 | 209 | 2,969 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 8.7 | 8.0 | 91.7% | 1 | 3.79s | 672 | 549 | 4,194 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 972ms | 7,909 | 521 | 2,269 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.0 | 22.2% | 1 | 23.37s | 7,893 | 5,199 | 29,973 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.16s | 107,683 | 3,750 | 11,351 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 19.56s | 23,854 | 435 | 6,811 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.06s | 8,322 | 739 | 1,499 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.65s | 7,776 | 268 | 1,881 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 846ms | 851 | 57 | 2,265 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.58s | 668 | 673 | 4,670 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 4.4 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 819ms | 525 | 99 | 748 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 9.81s | 516 | 189 | 557 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 16.7% | 1 | 972ms | 518 | 48 | 1,026 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.50s | 699 | 93 | 730 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 5.9 | 4.5 | 66.7% | 2 | 792ms | 768 | 249 | 2,214 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 1.87s | 696 | 265 | 1,184 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.72s | 10,440 | 388 | 2,537 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.77s | 8,391 | 317 | 906 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 782ms | 232 | 23 | 758 | |
| KAT Coder AIR V2.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 15.74s | 204 | 20 | 7,662 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
KAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeMercury 2.5lowvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeMercury 2.5lowvsMistral Small 4noneMercury 2.5lowvsMistral Small 4mediumKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumvsMistral Small 4noneMercury 2.5lowvsLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailableMercury 2.5lowvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5highMercury 2.5lowvsNemotron 3.5 LightninghighFree AvailableKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightninghighFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumMercury 2.5lowvsLing 3.0 FlashnoneLing 3.0 FlashnonevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5medium