Navigate
Advertise here

Mercury 2.5 (low) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

The average score is effectively tied at 5.1 vs 5.1. Mercury 2.5 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $0.157. Mercury 2.5 (low) is faster at 3.34s vs 6.21s, with pass rates of 37.7% vs 31.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#293
Total Output Tokens
40,302
Response Time (avg)
3.34s
Total Cost
$0.020
Rank
#295
Total Output Tokens
17,069
Response Time (avg)
6.21s
Total Cost
$0.157
Recommended model Mercury 2.5 (low)

It has the best score here (5.1), while costing about 8.2x less than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Detailed comparison

Metric Mercury 2.5 Mercury 2.5 low Release: 2026-09-08 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.1 5.1
Rank #293 #295
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.7
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.7% 31.9%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.319 3.128
Total Cost $0.020 $0.157
Input Price $0.040 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.150 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 326,083 273,075
Output Tokens 7,224 17,069
Reasoning Tokens 33,078 0
Response Time (avg) 3.34s 6.21s
Response Time (max) 47.06s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 76.80s 142.89s
Parameters ~100B 1.02T total (42B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#293 Mercury 2.5

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
2.4s
Tokens
1,236 tok

#295 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 972ms 7,909 521 2,269
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair