Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.5. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.048 vs $0.068. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 4.12s vs 8.42s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 37.9%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-ProIts score stays close to the best score here (5.5 vs 5.6), while responding about 2.0x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #142 #147
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 37.9%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.593 1.509
Total Cost $0.048 $0.068
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 51,472 124,799
Output Tokens 7,822 15,362
Reasoning Tokens 58,352 0
Response Time (avg) 8.42s 4.12s
Response Time (max) 48.19s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 185.24s 90.55s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#142 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

#147 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair