Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

Ling 3.0 Flash leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.6. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.048. Ling 3.0 Flash is faster at 3.46s vs 8.42s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 FlashIt has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 2.4x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14
Score 5.7 5.6
Rank #149 #157
Reliability 9.9 9.9
Consistency 10.0 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 45.5%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.593
Total Cost $0.000 $0.048
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 51,472
Output Tokens 12,783 7,822
Reasoning Tokens 0 58,352
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 8.42s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 48.19s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 185.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#149 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#157 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
23.7s
Tokens
4,924 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 3.6 7.0 22.2% 1 23.37s 7,893 5,199 29,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair