Navigate
Advertise here

Ling-3.0-flash vs Inkling Small (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. Ling-3.0-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.055. Inkling Small (low) is faster at 2.07s vs 3.56s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#229
Total Output Tokens
12,777
Response Time (avg)
3.56s
Total Cost
$0.004
Rank
#228
Total Output Tokens
14,686
Response Time (avg)
2.07s
Total Cost
$0.055
Recommended model Inkling Small (low)

It has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 1.7x faster than Ling-3.0-flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling-3.0-flash Ling-3.0-flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Inkling Small Inkling Small low Release: 2026-08-01
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #229 #228
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 50.0%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.649
Total Cost $0.004 $0.055
Input Price $0.021 / 1M $0.450 / 1M
Output Price $0.063 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,993 81,447
Output Tokens 12,777 2,715
Reasoning Tokens 0 11,971
Response Time (avg) 3.56s 2.07s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 5.82s
Response Time (total) 74.74s 45.64s
Parameters 124B total (5.1B active) 276B total (12B active)
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#229 Ling-3.0-flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#228 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
5.9s
Tokens
759 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-3.0-flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Inkling Small 4.6 5.0 33.3% 2 3.70s 7,374 375 4,332

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair