Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Inkling Small (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.7 vs 5.7. Ling 3.0 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.059. Inkling Small (low) is faster at 2.08s vs 3.46s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#165
Total Output Tokens
12,783
Response Time (avg)
3.46s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
14,653
Response Time (avg)
2.08s
Total Cost
$0.059
Recommended model Inkling Small (low)

It has the best score here (5.7), while responding about 1.7x faster than Ling 3.0 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash none Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Inkling Small Inkling Small low Release: 2026-08-01
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #165 #164
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 50.0%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.648
Total Cost $0.000 $0.059
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 124,176 81,438
Output Tokens 12,783 2,715
Reasoning Tokens 0 11,938
Response Time (avg) 3.46s 2.08s
Response Time (max) 17.51s 5.82s
Response Time (total) 76.06s 45.87s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 Ling 3.0 Flash

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
11.6s
Tokens
2,781 tok

#164 Thinking Machines: Inkling Small

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
5.9s
Tokens
759 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 6.39s 8,307 639 0
Inkling Small 4.6 5.0 33.3% 2 3.70s 7,374 375 4,332

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair