Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.3. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.061 vs $0.077. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 31.8%.

Recommended modelKAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 5.3
Rank #144 #161
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.7 7.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 31.8%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.097 1.496
Total Cost $0.077 $0.061
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 50,470 93,979
Output Tokens 3,957 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 111,374 0
Response Time (avg) 15.90s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 118.35s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 349.71s 110.40s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#144 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#161 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair