Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kimi K2.5 vs Laguna S 2.1 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.4. Laguna S 2.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.053 vs $0.101. Kimi K2.5 is faster at 18.03s vs 58.42s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 24.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-04

Rank
#243
Total Output Tokens
26,643
Response Time (avg)
18.03s
Total Cost
$0.101
Rank
#239
Total Output Tokens
339,595
Response Time (avg)
58.42s
Total Cost
$0.053
Recommended model Kimi K2.5

It has the best score here (5.4), while responding about 3.2x faster than Laguna S 2.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 medium Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 5.4 5.4
Rank #243 #239
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.8
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 24.2%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.278 1.451
Total Cost $0.101 $0.053
Input Price $0.450 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $2.250 / 1M $0.180 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,320 86,647
Output Tokens 26,643 97,298
Reasoning Tokens 0 242,297
Response Time (avg) 18.03s 58.42s
Response Time (max) 102.83s 560.31s
Response Time (total) 288.42s 1285.26s
Parameters 1T total (32B active) 118B total (8B active)
Availability Weights available Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#243 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

#239 Laguna S 2.1

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.0s
Tokens
867 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0
Laguna S 2.1 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 158.98s 7,917 93,354 106,718

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair